Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power of Many: How the Living Web is Transforming Politics, Business, and Everyday Life (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Power of Many: How the Living Web is Transforming Politics, Business, and Everyday Life[edit]
- The Power of Many: How the Living Web is Transforming Politics, Business, and Everyday Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Previously kept by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The power of many: how the living web is transforming politics, business, and everyday life, this is a book by a redlinked author, with an Amazon sales rank in the hundreds of thousands, making no apparent claim to anything other than mere existence. Yes, we can verify it exists, but I really don't see that as anything like enough. Guy (Help!) 20:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. ghits and Amazon reviews are useless. Leibniz 20:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete More bookspam. Should be speedied, if it weren't for the previous afd. Article has been around since August 2005, but hasn't gone beyond a marketing stub despite previous afd Bwithh 22:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if it ever sells more than 10.000 copies we can recreate the article Alf photoman 00:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now, if it does sell, then I'd think probably no-one would object to the article being recreated down the track, provided its with sources and so forth. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 02:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Sybex is an imprint of John Wiley & Co., one of the top book publishers. Keep books published by non-vanity presses. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.