Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Portable Dickon Edwards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dickon Edwards. Going to redirect this one on the agreeing that "redirects are cheap." SarahStierch (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Portable Dickon Edwards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable collection of lyrics; article has no sources, and I was unable to find any using Google Books and News. It's also not a very useful redirect, since it's not a frequently occurring combination of words. Drmies (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed, Google News and Books provided nothing relevant so the book probably never received any attention. SwisterTwister talk 22:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dickon Edwards where it is already covered, and because redirects are cheap. --Michig (talk) 06:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Dickon Edwards. No apparent sources to establish notability for standalone article per WP:BK. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for abysmally failing WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 04:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Dickon Edwards, per common sense. --Cavarrone (talk) 07:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect for absolute lack of reliable source coverage in news or anywhere else. Appears to be an obscure self-published lyrics book. Fails WP:GNG as well as other more specific guidelines. --Batard0 (talk) 09:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.