Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Political Spectrum of the left and the right in the Roman Catholic Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Political Spectrum of the left and the right in the Roman Catholic Church[edit]
- The Political Spectrum of the left and the right in the Roman Catholic Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Original research bordering on someting made up in school one day. Lacks neutral point of view and just begs for more of the same. Glendoremus 18:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. meshach 19:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, and also note that the article itself says that the Roman Catholic Church has no left or right. --Sable232 19:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all articles like this. -Amarkov blahedits 22:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. WJBscribe 00:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as possible original theory and lacking sources.-- danntm T C 01:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom, article is internally contradictory and very POV. SkierRMH,08:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Verifiability just isn't there and I don't see it arriving anytime soon. Entertaining original work. :)Alan.ca 07:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. This is an April Fools' joke. 67.171.43.170 03:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could think of better jokes in five minutes. NPOV violation just by looking out the title, Cnriaczoy42 22:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it. But I think someone may have been trying here, so don't be too hard on them.--Sandy Scott 09:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant OR and poorly sourced. Also poorly written. May be a good topic (or two) for an article, but this article isn't it. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 18:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.