Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The Phatory

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Phatory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The business does not satisfy WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. I have reviewed the argument in talk page saying it meets GNG and only http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/robinson/charles-mcgill-5-31-12.asp comes close to having significant coverage. The rest of the sources are more of profiles and directory listings that do not meet the definition of WP:SIGCOV. For a company to exist here, there must be significant coverage in multiple sources and at the absolute minimum, one must be regional, national or international but having one is not a guarantee of inclusion. Graywalls (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.