Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One and Only Zoe Lama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The One and Only Zoe Lama[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So far as I can see, there's nothing to distinguish this. It's (in terms of notability) very much a typical children's novel as far as I can tell. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete It's listed in bookshop sites, but there's no sign of any serious critical review or comment. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no reviews or articles. SL93 (talk) 23:57, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.