Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Official International Queen Fan Club (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Official International Queen Fan Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a non-notable organization. The arguments from the 2008 AfD aren't convincing, being in the Guinness Book of World Records isn't a claim of notability. There are no references in the article that suggest GNG is met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. as it doesn't pass GNG. Cheers! Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 07:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Being around a long time doesn't establish notability (sorry, Granny). They've certainly had enough time to establish notability, but failed. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 22:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.