Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Objective Standard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Objectivist periodicals. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Objective Standard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any discussion of this magazine that can confer notability. Angryapathy (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Objectivist periodicals. I agree that it is not independently notable, but it is a useful search term and there is no reason why information about it can't be included in the larger article. --RL0919 (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge Self published not notable journal. Maybe it has a place in a larger article. Guyonthesubway (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Objectivist periodicals. TallNapoleon (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Objectivist periodicals - seems to be a perfectly reasonable solution per above. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/merge per above. Bearian (talk) 16:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant info into Objectivist periodicals. — BRIAN0918 • 2010-02-13 19:17Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.