Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The November Criminals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:IAR early close, as the nominator's notability concerns have clearly been addressed. Sandstein 09:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The November Criminals[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable novel, as is clear from the total lack of hits and reviews. If there are reviews in reliable sources, I'd love to see them. Drmies (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Although it hasn't been worked into the article text yet, there is a New York Times review of the article mentioned on the talk page (and in the first, withdrawn AfD: see WP:Articles for deletion/The November Criminals (2010 novel)). I'll add it as an EL. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added 3 reviews, and will soon find others. (I speedy deleted an earlier version as copyvio. Since this one still sounded promotional sounded remarkably like a publisher's description, I rewrote the entire article) The very search the nom. includes as showing the lack of reviews includes reviews from the NYT and the Washington Post, and a citation that it was a NYT Editors Choice ! When following WP:BEFORE, it is good to pay some attention to what you find. DGG ( talk ) 23:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KeepPer DGG. As long as the copyvio is eliminated. Quinn ^{✩ STARRY NIGHT} 02:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The November Criminals (2010 novel) which was closed earlier today. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per DGG's good work in sourcing the article. Well done! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.