Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Music Industry Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Music Industry Society[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation failing WP:ORGCRITE due to a lack of significant independent coverage on the company.

Speedy declined in 2015 for containing an independent source, a page about an event they held, although this appears to be fairly routine and I do not believe it indicates significance; just for events occurring in Chicago today, there are 270 very similar pages on that site. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My PROD was contested without comment or improvement. No third party WP:RS to show notability and I could not find any. Fails WP:NORG. shoy (reactions) 12:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have viewed your comments and will make the corrections. Also, please kindly consider that this organization is encyclopedic and is a stub. Thank you for your attention and feedback. Newsmediasource (talk)
Delete Article has no significant independent coverage to meet the GNG. No problem with this article being placed as a draft in the creator's space.Sandals1 (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My own searching failed to discover any WP:RS. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please strongly consider keeping or an alternative to deletion. Many good articles started their Wikilife as a stub identical to this one and still exist. -- Newsmediasource (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Newsmediasource (talk · contribs) has already voted 'keep' above; not sure what continued lobbying is meant to accomplish. They also have not responded to a COI notice of a week ago. See full edit history. 2601:188:180:1481:7868:6144:7C5D:484A (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.