Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Muse (2011 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Muse (2011 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria at WP:NOTFILM. Krychek (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as citing RottenTomatoes is a quite underwhelming excuse of sourcing and as I was watching this, I can say there's absolutely nothing for genuine notability and substance hence delete. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are few hits on Google, and none of them look reliable at all. I can't even find independent confirmation that it was released. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Due to the commonality of the name, it is difficult to research to establish whether this is notable or not. My searches did not turn up anything to indicate such, but if in-depth sourcing can be provided, I am always ready to listen. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Google search for the-muse 2011 "taylor grant" -wikipedia brings up nothing of relevance except various IMDb clones. I've found a few film reviews (e.g.), but they seem to be about a film of the same name made by different people. I'm assuming SwisterTwister meant IMDb because I've found no evidence of it being on RT (that would anyway be fairly unlikely with 14 votes on IMDb). Daß Wölf 00:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't really see any substantial references. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.