Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mondrians
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Mondrians[edit]
- The Mondrians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article on a Swiss band was created on 2 January 2009 by a user who has not been seen since. The article was tagged for notability in January 2010, and none has been suggested since. It remains unsourced, despite request in November 2009. A quick Google search brought up no independent sources to testify to this group's notability; links were to Wikis, blogs, facebook and other sites belonging to the group itself. The article says that the band has recorded some home-made demos (not notable - what band hasn't?) and has recorded one album, though no sales or charts figures are given. Unless I'm missing something (which is possible - I'm not genned up on modern bands) this article fails on notability grounds. Emeraude (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because same reasons.
- Keep Both On a search for "Les Mondrians" on Google there are a few more results. Have added one reference to the article as an example which backs up the name of one of their songs. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 20:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what the linked site is, but it's a fairly meagre blog-like entry as far as I can tell, which generated not enough interest to get a single reply. Not what I would call a reliable source and hardly indicative of notabilty. Emeraude (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The reference is a French music magazine. The website has contact details including a postal address for the office of the magazine. It's not a blog and the article is not blog-like. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 17:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what the linked site is, but it's a fairly meagre blog-like entry as far as I can tell, which generated not enough interest to get a single reply. Not what I would call a reliable source and hardly indicative of notabilty. Emeraude (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.