Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Misadventures of P.B. Winterbottom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Misadventures of P.B. Winterbottom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not indicate encyclopedic notability tho it may after release. No reliable sources, only blogs. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-11-08t12:08z 12:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Only Kotaku is a blog, but it has editorial controls; the sources are otherwise reliable gaming news sites. May not seem notable now, but why not let the stub stay until the game is released, instead of forcing someone to go through the trouble of recreating the article? BlazerKnight (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: 2K Games is a pretty notable video game publisher, at worst this is a merge. - BalthCat (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; IGN, 1up, and Escapist are not blogs and Kotaku is a reliable blog, as noted above. Four different reliable independent sources, I fail to see how they don't establish notability. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources meeting WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable sources already, but even then: a game appearing on the Xbox Live Arcade (note, not Xbox Live Indie Games, which are user-uploaded and thus not vetted) has been vetted for use on the service, giving it implicit notability. --MASEM (t) 18:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has good notability. Bad faith nomination. Next time please do research before you are sending it to AFD. This is not the first time you are doing this. --SkyWalker (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.