Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Miracles Report
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Miracles Report[edit]
- The Miracles Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a press release type article about a non-notable report by some charity. Atlantima (talk) 02:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Atlantima (talk) 02:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While it seems to be a noble cause, I can find nothing to show that this report received any notice or coverage that would have it passing notability guidelines. On a somewhat side note, I'll be nominating a related article, Critical Containment Methodology for deletion under the same rationale. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:V. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.