Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mighty Moe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Mighty Moe[edit]

The Mighty Moe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This rap artist is not notable. I tried to clean up the references but there is nothing available on this person. I got one return from google that referenced his sound cloud. I really don't like deleting articles, for the record but I just couldn't rescue this one.   Bfpage |leave a message  19:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, possibly a speedy delete under A7. Not a notable band at all. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)u[reply]
This is one guy, not even a band   Bfpage |leave a message  22:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 03:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  03:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Eman235/talk 04:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable rap spam. TOOSOON, NOTE, and lack of RS. likely self-promotional. Cramyourspam (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.