Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Matrix Philosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Matrix Philosophy[edit]

An original work about The Matrix. - 7-bubёn >t 23:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No references provided. I am eating Ramen (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - OR, unreferenced. andy (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 23:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete perr nom. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 00:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:N, and WP:NEO. Tiptoety ^talk 04:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's ironic that an article about the matrix would fail WP:NEO. Spinach Monster (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I guess you deserve at least LOL for that :) The JPS ^{talk to me} 20:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Influences and interpretations of The Matrix#Philosophy_and_psychoanalysis. JulesH (talk) 09:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ditto Spinach Monster (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tiptoey (well spotted!) AlexTiefling (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable or as a hoax or as no context or for lack of content or for ....... Esasus (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.