Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mathematics of Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects at editorial discretion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Mathematics of Love[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. Can't find much beyond performance dates from google searches. bojo | talk 22:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I also tried to find a reliable source for the subject. However I am not able to find anything "concreate." Reb1981 (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Hannah Fry. The article is a theatre play written by Cherríe Moraga that ran for four days last year at Stanford. Other than reviews by the colleges' publications ([1] and [2]), I haven't been able to find any significant independent sources for this to meet WP:GNG. The author of the article @Tblightning8394: says as much in their edit summary: ...Cherrie Moraga's newest un-published drama set to debut August 2017. The structure of the article also need work; the lead is a confused mix of plot, the character list lacks cast members and the rest of the article reads like a cross between WP:NOTESSAY and a WP:COATRACK.

My initial internet searches for "The Mathematics of Love" led me to a 2014 TEDx talk and book by Fry, which is far more notable by virtue of sourcing (Washington Post, stuff.co.nz, Livemint, etc) than this play, hence the retargeting. Fuebaey (talk) 02:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.