Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Malpaso Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the article that was the subject of this AfD has been speedily deleted (G3) by JzG. The redirect left at The Malpaso Company has been retargeted. All is well. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Malpaso Company[edit]

Non-notable company under WP:CORP. No reliable independent sources presented (all sources presented are not about the subject of the article and only one even mentions it). Declined speedy. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 08:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Smells like a WP:HOAX. You'd think this would return more than 30 hits? §FreeRangeFrog 00:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G3 I'm calling hoax too, something this big would turn up more hits for sure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Malpaso Productions, (aka Malpaso Company) is important in film history as Clint Eastwood's production company, with an interesting story to go with it. It is odd that like Enron, this is a Texas oil futures trading company that gets cachet from the movie business. --Mr Accountable (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unless I'm missing something, this page has been moved and speedied as of Feb 21. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Malpaso Company is currently a redirect to a deleted page, but Malpaso Productions (which seems legit) claims The Malpaso Company as a former name -- does anyone object to redirecting The Malpaso Company to Malpaso Productions? Baileypalblue (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. Beagel (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did it (and cleaned up the Malpaso Productions article a bit while I was at it). Deor (talk) 16:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.