Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magus of Strovolos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kyriacos C. Markides. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Magus of Strovolos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable book with no significant independent reviews. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to author. I'm finding some mention of this book in relation to the author, so this could conceivably be a redirect to his article, where the book is mentioned. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm arguing for a redirect is that I am finding coverage for his other books (reviews) and this book has been used as a source. I think that if there are sources, then they're likely not on the internet because of how long ago it was published. Essentially I think that there's the potential for someone to find more and if this happens to occur after the AfD then the redirect can be undone. I don't think that this is at particular risk of being restored without there being sourcing, so there's nothing to lose by making a redirect. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above while keeping the article history as it is not a total lost cause, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per ReaderofthePack is fine, book doesn't meet BKCRIT. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 04:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.