Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magical Mystery Tour (tour)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GedUK 19:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Magical Mystery Tour (tour)[edit]
- The Magical Mystery Tour (tour) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is an advert for this guy's non-notable tourism business. I am also going to put his business up for AfD. Jrtayloriv (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I am not going to put his club up, which does have a reliable source mentioning it. But I still don't think that this tour service he provides is notable enough to warrant it's own article. And even if it is somehow notable, it should probably be merged into the article for his business. Jrtayloriv (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that the tour is not notable enough for its own article but I do think that it should be mentioned in the Cavern Club article. Tsange ►talk 14:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Tough call. There's no coverage of the travel tour itself, so on that grounds it could easily be deleted for failing to meet WP:N, and also because of the fact that this article is clearly advertising. I can see weak grounds for merging this reference into the Cavern Club article, but only as a minor reference and not as a full section. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unnotable tour operation; not really ideal for merging as it really isn't related to it -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.