Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MG2s

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (repost). M a rtinp23 19:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The MG2s[edit]

Self-serving, non-notable band. No verfiability, no sources, violation of WP:NOT (As in Wikipedia is not a crystal ball). Is just a local band. Pumeleon 06:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely no indication that the band meets WP:MUSIC. Even if the "Sun Sentinal" (sic) reference can be shown to be real, the band is still local in scope, and likely wouldn't pass the criteria for multiple non-trivial mentions vis-a-vis WP:RS. And no folks, Myspace is still not a reliable source... --Kinu ^t/_c 06:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, just saying "is notable" isn't nearly enough. And 200 CDs sold doesn't make a band notable either.. WP:NOT MySpace. Perel 07:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MUSIC and WP:V, 20 ghits. MER-C 07:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSIC, very weak assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 07:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If you have an argument for the inclusion of this band beyond quotes from people who might not exist, then leave it here on this page, do not blank it. Read this for notability guidelines for musicians. You fail to satisfy any of them, or even come close. The band in question is merely a local band. Pumeleon^T 16:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Second Comment - I have had to put the {{afd1}} on this page three times; once to start the process, and replacing it twice after it was removed. I have also had to restore this page after it was blanked twice. I suggest Speedy Delete and Salting the Earth. Pumeleon^T 19:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- We can't speedy it because CSD A7 is met in the article, where an assertation of notability is made. We're just going to have to deal with the user him/herself, as a speedy deletion now will only incite him/her to file a DRV or something similar. M a rtinp23 19:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looked at the page logs, and changed my mind :) Already deleted four times. M a rtinp23 19:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.