Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Love Willows
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Hope Partlow. Without loss of history joe deckertalk to me 17:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Love Willows[edit]
- The Love Willows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are all primary or unreliable. Claims notability with a deal with Decca and an individually notable member, but still fails WP:BAND as there are no reliable sources to be found anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Hope Partlow and convert to a redirect. Partlow, one of the members of the group, appears to be a notable musician. The information here can be consolidated into the coverage of Hope & Ryan/The Love Willows in her article. The term will remain a useful search term, so a redirect should be maintained even if the history is not (but I believe the history should be retained). —C.Fred (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per C.Fred's sound analysis. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Redirect to Hope Partlow. I agree with C.Fred's analysis regarding merging, although I am not sure that there is much worthwhile material in this article that is not already covered in the Hope Partlow article. But even if not, a redirect is appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.