Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Long Rocker (Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 18:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Long Rocker (Album)[edit]

This is a debut album that has not yet charted, on a label that is still redlinked. Surely not yet notable. Slashme (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:MUSIC says it's not notable at all, and besides that, it makes no assertion of notability. In the unlikely event it is notable, the author really must assert it. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 10:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back into Kemman for failing to establish notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums: "articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article". Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 13:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both the album and Kemman. I see no proof that the band meets notability guidelines per WP:MUSIC, and if they don't, then their album doesn't either. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 10:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.