Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The London Theatre – New Cross

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw to Keep as I see nothing better happening here (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The London Theatre – New Cross[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply a local theatre for which my searches have only found pieces of expected local coverage, I haven't found nothing anything noticeably better to suggest better improvements for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in looking beyond the article:

alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

festival:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep per being "local" to London is not a negative, and London media coverage is exactly what we would expect for London cinema, as shown by the number theaters "local" to other cites and countries.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Article could certainly be expanded and cited through the many sources to share its background and history and notability to London, England. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as found sources confirm WP:GNG. SwisterTwister, did you do any research at all? ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with both MichaelQSchmidt and ThePlatypusofDoomThanks. Picomtn (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obvious notability per above. Softlavender (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.