Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Light Bearer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 03:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Light Bearer[edit]

Delete book reveve of nn novel San Saba 19:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, both novel and author meet notability criteria [1] [2]. But replace the plot summary of this New-Agey historical potboiler with suitable stub for now. Monicasdude 20:52, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 03:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article reads like high school book report, but still notable enough. Strange that we don't have an article on Donna Gillespie though. Eivind ^t ^@^c 04:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep- dunno of book reviews belong on the 'pedia, but why not? Reyk 06:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete book reviews doesn't belong on the WP. MaNeMeBasat 14:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable book. However, needs cleanup as WP is not a place for reviews. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Terence Ong. -Dawson 20:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep needs work though. wikilink, expansion, etc.Newyorktimescrossword 20:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and re-write to meet standards. --Jay(Reply) 23:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rewrite. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-28 11:39Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.