Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Labyrinth Plus! Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Labyrinth Plus! Edition[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTHOWTO. Page has been unsourced for six years, and fails WP:NVG; a Google search turns up nothing but YouTube videos, and Google Books only has a couple of brief mentions in books about Microsoft XP. Miniapolis 20:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Miniapolis 20:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Even if this were notable (it is not), it would still need a WP:TNT as this article is basically WP:NOTHOWTO and would need a comprehensive, fundamental rewrite. Since there is, well, no SIGCOV I can see, it's best to remove this from Wikipedia. Java Hurricane 08:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability per WP:GNG/WP:NVG. NOTHOWTO is an argument for WP:TNT, not deletion, though. IceWelder [✉] 11:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article just doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - violates a number of Wikipedia policies and guidelines but, most importantly, does not seem to pass GNG Spiderone 21:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.