Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The LOGOS Ministry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The LOGOS Ministry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing better than some links at Books and browser and this has hardly changed since the author moved it to mainspace themselves from userspace. Notifying tagger Esprit15d. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- The article seems to be guilty of POPPY language and probably exaggeration. It has the feel of being a single church congregation trying to pretend it is something more substantial. As I am unsure, I am not voting. If kept, to should be moved to GenOn Ministries, the current name. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. essentially a non-notable publisher . DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches did not reveal enough to show they meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.