Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Juice Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Juice Station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added a reference. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - While it is a stub, the provided reference is properly sourced and provides solid coverage about the company. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sentence "It is currently in the process of rolling out 100 units" says enough. Secret of success (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article is clearly advertising for an idea that is not unique (there are similar named businesses elsewhere) and appears to have failed. They might have targeted 100 but the blog here has had no updates since 2009 and has few followers. They have no website. There is nothing remotely distinctive or notable about this failed business. It's just someone selling smoothies from a van. If this is notable so is every mobile burger van. Delete. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability not established. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 10:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.