Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Judas Kiss novel by David Butler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Judas Kiss novel by David Butler[edit]
- The Judas Kiss novel by David Butler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBOOK. - Balph Eubank ✉ 15:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is probably another case of WP:TOOSOON but I would have expected, at least, one other source. A search at Google News, Google News Ireland and the Irish Examiner provided no additional results. I must say though, at least the book gained somewhat attention through The Sunday Times. SwisterTwister talk 17:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 07:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Normally, this should be redirected to the parent article, David Butler, but the current article name, "The Judas Kiss novel by David Butler", is not a likely search term.--xanchester (t) 16:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This has one review and I can't find anything else to show that this passes WP:NBOOK. I agree with Xanchester in that this isn't going to really be a viable search term. I've done some cleanup on the main article for Butler, as much of it wasn't properly sourced (being mostly primary and merchant links) and somewhat non-NPOV.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.