Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jeremiah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Jeremiah[edit]
- The Jeremiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable magazine per WP:GNG, unreferenced, conflict of interest per WP:COI ( [1]), speedy deletion template removed once by creator User:Jeremiahstaff and once by suspected sockpuppeteer (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HumphreyScottXavier). WP:PROMO piece by staff founder of magazine. See also Prince Victor Salamat. MuffledThud (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 00:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nomination. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Let's spike this spam forthwith. Qworty (talk) 04:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, blatant WP:SPAM. --Kinu t/c 04:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.