Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Illegal Waste
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Illegal Waste[edit]
- The Illegal Waste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable, only sources are reviews. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Reviews are perfectly valid sources, provided that they appear in reliable sources (such as Radio 4 or the BBC) and provide significant coverage, as these do. -- Eastmain (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: 3 reliable sources that show notability are in the article. Schuym1 (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The links in the article that Schuym1 is referring to: 1 A year-end column (by someone who appears not to work for the BBC—he's a "contributor"—nor write professionally) on the BBC Tyne website (regional, mind you) that mentions—not reviews—the band (reliable? yes (reasonably so); shows notability? no) 2 A band "profile" (a reprint from their MySpace page) on the channel4 website (not really reliable, certainly not notable in the least) 3 a listing at Last.fm (neither reliable nor notable). Fails WP:MUSIC. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 20:09, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Hello Control and scarce relevent ghits (only a few sites and a youtube video) Billscottbob (talk) 01:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per Hello Control and Billscottbob -- notability is too sketchy to warrant consideration. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Hello Control. Vanity, vanity, all is vanity. Themfromspace (talk) 03:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete', would not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Insuffcient coverage of the band to justify an article.--Michig (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a music promotion website doktorb wordsdeeds 12:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.