Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hype House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 09:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Hype House[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, non notable group of TikTok users. Does not demonstrage notability. CaffeinAddict (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Poorly sourced as in The New York Times, Forbes and Business Insider? I don't get where you're coming from. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nkon21: While I agree the article should be kept, Forbes articles written by "contributors" such as the one cited are unreliable, and Business Insider is listed as situational and is currently undergoing another RfC. SK2242 (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CaffeinAddict (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CaffeinAddict (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep The article is properly sourced and there has been significant coverage of the group, also many of the members are notable. JayJay^{What did I do?} 05:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep I was in the belief that when a given topic (whatever the topic is) was covered by the New York Times and Forbes, then it was notable. We need to change our guidelines about notability if it's not the case anymore. --Deansfa (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. The article is reliably sourced and clearly demonstrates its subject's notability. (See WP:GNG.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets GNG:
1. Walker, Harriet (April 11, 2020). "TikTok's Hype House: home of Chase Hudson, Charli D'Amelio and friends". The Times. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
2. "Hype House TikTokers called out for being bad influencers". CBC Kids News. July 29, 2020. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
3. Lorenz, Taylor (July 9, 2020). "It Looks Like a Reality Show. Why Not Just Make It One?". The New York Times. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
4. Schroeder, Audra (January 6, 2020). "The TikTok Hype House is now a thing—here's what you need to know". The Daily Dot. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
There is also a wealth of coverage from situational and reliability-undiscussed sources such as Seventeen, Insider and Tubefilter. SK2242 (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A house where internet-famous children film their TikTok videos does not meet WP:NBUILDING. KidAd talk 00:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KidAd: The article is about the group, not the house, and me and others have clearly demonstrated it meets GNG. SK2242 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.