Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hot 20 Countdown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Hot 20 Countdown[edit]

The Hot 20 Countdown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced article about a radio program. This one was syndicated to several radio stations, meaning it would probably pass WP:NMEDIA if it could be reliably sourced, but NMEDIA does not grant radio shows an exemption from having to be reliably sourced just because the article claims a notability pass -- and the only "sources" here are primary ones: archive captures of its own webpage, and its host's own Myspace. This is not enough to qualify a radio show for inclusion. Bearcat (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Any countdown show article that doesn't well-detail its inclusion requirements (or doesn't even make clear what it's counting down; there definitely is no CHR/Christian Radio genre at all, which is actually called Contemporary Christian music) doesn't get close to a keep, and this show didn't have much notability outside of the Canadian CCM community. CT-20 is from the same originating editor with the same poor structure and I would support an AfD on that also. Nate (chatter) 17:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete can't find any reliable secondary sourcing, agree with above "delete" voters ArchieOof (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.