Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The HeavyTrackerz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica1000 06:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The HeavyTrackerz[edit]

The HeavyTrackerz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The phrase "you're a parasite, and this interview is terminated" springs to mind. The only reason I'm not CSDing this is because it contained a claim that they had won the "best grime act" at the Mobo Awards; upon investigation, I learned MC Stormzy had won it and the claim was based on the fact that this group had produced an album of his. It has since been removed. Otherwise, no indication of notability and I think this needs being deleted and salted. Launchballer 20:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The HeavyTrackers are clearly of note as they have produced two of the biggest Grime records of the year. Both of which won awards at the MOBOs. Perhaps it was interpreted it incorrectly but it was stated that Stormzy won this award and The HeavyTrackerz were the producers. They have significant production and writing credits on other songs which will be added in due course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Insanity (talkcontribs) 10:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.