Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hague Approach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hague Approach[edit]

The Hague Approach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is created by User:Has164; the same user who made large contributions to the article for the The Hague Institute for Global Justice, which is the organisation that developed the set of principles of this "approach." This could be forgiven when the article is sourced by third-party sources, when there is a lot of information on the internet about it, or when a lot of wikipedia-articles link to it. None of these conditions are fulfilled. The only references are from the institute that created the approach. The internet hasn't much to offer, while there are only two links from ther articles linking to this article: from the innstitute itself and from the article of a former president. This will be an uncontroversial deletion. Jeff5102 (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a WP:BEFORE search didn't come up with anything that wasn't from the institute or very closely related to the institute. SportingFlyer talk 21:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.