Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Grinch (video game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, AfD by a sock puppet of User:Erock23432. --MuZemike 05:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Grinch (video game)[edit]
- The Grinch (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just how this article is written is just almost completely messed up! It seems like the information was copied from non-free copyrighted sources or game guides. Because of this, part of the information on this article should be partly merged in the original film article. New Living Wiki Editor (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 1.) If you want a merge, this is not "Articles for merging". 2.) AFD IS NOT CLEANUP. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to film page the article is in bad shape, but information on the game should be somewhere on Wikipedia. JDDJS (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep AFD is not clean-up, merging independantly notable topics into fewer articles does not magically improve the information therein. Someoneanother 23:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No deletion rationale provided. AFD is not cleanup. No reason to merge. A412 (Talk • C) 23:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - The nomination is not a deletion nom., it is a merge nom.; that's not for AfD. Salvidrim! 01:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.