Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Greatest Hits Collection III
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per G7. The author placed a db-author tag. --JForget 01:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Greatest Hits Collection III[edit]
- The Greatest Hits Collection III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sources, can't find anything on a third greatest hits, CMT doesn't have anything about this album Caldorwards4 (talk) 22:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete. Just redirect until more info comes on whatever type of album it is going to be. By the way, just because it isn't sourced DOES NOT mean that it isn't true, it never did. Some dumb clown must have made that source and verify rule up. Ryanbstevens (talk) 23:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I will say that i didn't know what i was thinking when i created this article, but i have gotten rid of the unsourced info about the new album on the biography page, noticing that it wasn't sourced. Ryanbstevens (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.