Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Good, The Bad and The Sholay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. As MelanieN notes, even though it is not notable enough to merit its own article, that in and of itself does not preclude its mere inclusion in a list of past work within a stage director's article. postdlf (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Good, The Bad and The Sholay[edit]
- The Good, The Bad and The Sholay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; original rationale was "no evidence of notability" per this edit. Student-written play that was performed at a university arts festival. Attempts to assert notability by association, but the only third party coverage appears to be one newspaper article, and thus does not seem to satisfy WP:GNG. Kinu t/c 21:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Speedy would almost apply, as it doesn't even claim notability, and certainly doesn't establish it, likely because it can't. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It certainly is a student-written play but it was directed by Huzir Sulaiman and Claire Wong. Mohit Kanwal (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- To be frank, this statement really means nothing. There still needs to be coverage in WP:RS about it. --Kinu t/c 08:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright please go ahead and delete the article, I still do not understand, when one can verify the existence of the play directed by a prominent dramatist, why does then it needs a separate WP:RS reference? Mohit Kanwal (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- comment Because the guidelines of Wikipedia, in general, require that is has verifiable wp:rs references. It isn't a statement on the quality of the play, only its notability according to the guidelines herein. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What about Curating the list of plays that a person has produced? Mohit Kanwal (talk) 02:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- comment Because the guidelines of Wikipedia, in general, require that is has verifiable wp:rs references. It isn't a statement on the quality of the play, only its notability according to the guidelines herein. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright please go ahead and delete the article, I still do not understand, when one can verify the existence of the play directed by a prominent dramatist, why does then it needs a separate WP:RS reference? Mohit Kanwal (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- To be frank, this statement really means nothing. There still needs to be coverage in WP:RS about it. --Kinu t/c 08:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The play is non-notable, but it could be documented via a mention at the article Huzir Sulaiman. Suggestion to Mohit Kanwal: you might want to devote some effort to expanding and improving the Huzir Sulaiman article, which hasn't been improved for several years; it doesn't even mention the Checkpoint Theatre. --MelanieN (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.