Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glitterball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Glitterball[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG SarahStierch (talk) 22:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Minor children's film sure, but meets WP:NF in having screened in festivals and/or retrospectives more than five years after original release. Might be stubby, but that's okay. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The book A Dictionary of Film Studies said that the film is one of Children's Film Foundation's most successful features. The company is notable enough to have their films in the British Film Institute. It is a short review, but Time Out still reviewed a rare 1977 children's film - [1]. I only mentioned those sources just in case someone wants to improve the article, but the film being in a major film festival 33 years after its original release makes it pass WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I see that Schmidt and Tokyogirl added two of those sources already. Awesome. SL93 (talk) 22:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous arguments. Clearly passes notability standards. Andrew³²⁷ 12:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.