Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Geothermal energy exhibition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hellisheiði Power Station. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:55, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Geothermal energy exhibition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Propose redirect to Hellisheiði Power Station since this exhibition doesn't seem to have any notability. I had previously redirected it but that has since been reverted. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I felt it was important to have this museum included in museums in Iceland. They greet tens of thousands of people every year from all over the world, and they are also working with schools from around the world. It's an important article relating to the use of geothermal energy in Iceland. --Kristjan.petursson (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Kristjan.petursson (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect is cheap and easy. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. The two sources can just be put into Hellisheiði Power Station. Finealt (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Merge discussions should not happen at AfD. Discuss merge and redirect on article talk pages. This should have happened WP:BEFORE nomination. ~KvnG 00:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Any editor can perform a blank and redirect. If it is disputed, then it can be reverted and discussed on the talk page. If the outcome of the discussion is Merge/Redirect than that can also be done by an editor or they can request a page move. In either case there is no reason to bring this to AfD unless the nominator is asking for deletion which is not the case here. So this is a bit of a misfiling, probably due to inexperience, which is OK as we are all learning. But now you know for the future.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brainy J did redirect. There was no edit summary, no WP:PROD, no merge proposal, no talk page discussion. AfD was the next step. Let's keep the article and if someone still wants to pursue it, they should go back and do the missed steps. ~KvnG 23:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this. Don't even redirect. I just created the redirect Geothermal energy exhibition without the "The" at the start of the title. More people will type that into the search bar. Who searches "The," really? As for this hopeless Article here discussed, it has basically no information so we might as well delete it. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.