Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gay Byrne Music Show
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Gay Byrne. v/r - TP 17:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Gay Byrne Music Show[edit]
- The Gay Byrne Music Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost certainly non-notable; Google finds very little on it, and creator has added nothing to it since 9th August. Unlikely ever to make a decent article. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 06:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Almost certainly non-notable. Why not? Read WP:TVSHOW. This article covers a show with a national geographical range noted in reliable sources. "Google finds very little on it..." Well, Wikipedia is not an internet search engine. "...[The] creator has added nothing to it since 9th August". Read WP:NOEFFORT. Lack of edits for a month is hardly grounds for deletion. "Unlikely ever to make a decent article." This may be true but such prognostication is frowned on. However, even though I've been bashing, I actually agree with you a bit in spirit but the solution in such case is to merge the content with Gay Byrne or some other article and redirect it, not to delete it. — AjaxSmack 08:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: to Gay Byrne. ww2censor (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per non-notable, even the article concedes it is just "filler". Merge to Gay Byrne at best. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.