Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gathering (Glengarry Bhoys album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Gathering (Glengarry Bhoys album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that the subject meets WP:NALBUM notability (or WP:GNG). - Mr X 14:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I would contest that the subject meets WP:NALBUM notability (or WP:GNG). Just because one person's treasure is another person's trash doesn't mean everything on the internet should be deleted. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is bad logic. And coming from a musician, I at least have some claim of knowledge on the subject (even though, yes, that would be an appeal to expertism of a sort). I would discuss at that link there if it wasn't a red herring and a wild goose chase. I do wonder why this subject can't be dropped and better things moved onto, or does somebody here just loathe and abhor bagpipes or something? Oh, and FTR, I have been in touch with a member of OTRS whom is very willing to help me out with what almost appears to be some senseless vendetta, but I know better. The records clearly show that User:Jennica used my contribution of the article as a stepping stone to fuel and boost her own record, of which I have already notified OTRS multiple times. It's only a matter of time, now. I do not appreciate being used and abused. - Blast Vortex (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Blast Vortex: "Boost what record"? I am not abusing anybody. I am following the guidelines. I know that this album is not notable in any way. Maybe you need to brush up on some guidelines and try talking to me [or whoever else you accuse] before running to other editors about this "issue" you have. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 17:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A web search came up with two review for me but I don't think that is enough to pass WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. @Blast Vortex: what the heck are you talking about? Can you provide diffs at my talk page or something for these broad allegations?TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NALBUM. I am also befuddled with Blast Vortex's comments... DrStrauss talk please use {{ping|DrStrauss}} when replying 09:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Some searching for independent coverage of the album does not turn up anything significant. The album has not received any notice, so it does not satisfy the general notability guidelines for inclusion. In addition, the album does not appear to have received any awards or significant playing time that would cause it to satisfy the guideline for album notability. Malinaccier (talk) 16:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.