Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fusilli Jerry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Fusilli Jerry[edit]

Unreferenced for over a year, no assertion that it passes WP:N. Even if we were to use the proposed WP:FICT, this has no real world content, and it does not seem to be a very important episode of Seinfeld, as such things go. Dearth of Rats (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reasons given by the nominator are reasons for improvement, not deletion. Edward321 (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I may be a bit confused. I thought failing a notability guideline was a reason for deletion. Dearth of Rats (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, and then consider whether to Merge into a suitable combined article . Such should be the default way to deal with these, and it does not take AfD. There is no really accepted guideline for episodes of fiction, just for fictional works as a whole: beyond there, everything is disputed. Whether or not to combine the articlesis for the talk page, but at t he very least they should be trimmed a little and combined, not deleted. DGG (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If we're going to delete all the television series episode summaries, we have a lot of work ahead! The article could use some references, but otherwise meets Wiki guidelines for inclusion. Me thinks the nominator doesn't like Seinfeld. Proxy User (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge not notable. Were the plot summary be reduced to the acceptable limit, 300 words, it would not be a viable spinout article either. Sceptre ^(talk) 13:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.