Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Further Adventures of Barry Lyndon by Himself

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Christopher Wood (writer). Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Further Adventures of Barry Lyndon by Himself[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the author probably wrote notable books, this is not one. Unable to find multiple reviews in reliable sources (WP:AUTHOR #3). There are a few mentions in Google Books but they are trivial records not significant coverage (WP:GNG). It's somewhat telling that on LibraryThing with 1.7 million members[1] only two members claim the book,[2] which is a good sign of obscurity even in its own day. Green Cardamom (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to The Luck of Barry Lyndon. There's a few brief references on Google Books (I added one to the article), and possibly was a little print coverage at the time of publication (1976), so there's no doubt that this existed and was published by a real publisher, but there's no indication that this is separately notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Christopher Wood (writer), the author of the book. -- Whpq (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (or merge) to author. I would not like to see article on works by major authors being cluttered up with those who seek to bandwaggon by writing a sequel. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.