Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The French Connection (production company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The French Connection (production company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a pornography company sourced only to the company website. I looked for additional references and found nothing to satisfy WP:NCORP. (XBIZ and AVN do have some routine coverage of product announcements, business partnerships, and the like -- note that these end with the company sales manager's contact information, a likely sign of PR.) Cheers, gnu 57 17:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 17:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 17:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 17:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent reliable source coverage to be found at all, never mind anything that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH. Porn trade press consists of obvious press releases and other obvious primary source content. • Gene93k (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. The article looks more like a propaganda piece. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 13:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.