Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Franchise Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources have been shown. Candidly, I am surprised that the page hasn't been G11'd since if the promotional content is removed there would be nothing left. Tke 'Week keep' hasn't offered any basis for notability. Finally, I note that it doesn't merit a mention in the Franchising page. Just Chilling (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Franchise Magazine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMAGAZINE. No reliable sources to substantiate any of the claims in this article. Rogermx (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Highly specialised magazine and certainly encyclopedic, but none to zero coverage as it is so specialised. Certainly notable, but I don't think it will have more than 1 or 2 sources, ultimately. Potential for redirect if target can be found. scope_creep^Talk 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 01:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 01:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trade mag. reads like an ADVERT. ORPHAN. Lacks SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject fails WP:GNG for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I have been able to find 0 sources to add to this. The keep vote also admits that there is no coverage and uses the WP:ITSNOTABLE rationale. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.