Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Foxhole Sessions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Foxhole Sessions[edit]
- The Foxhole Sessions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Cousinss (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Non-notable demo tape by Random Gender. Fails NALBUM because of no major awards, reviews etc. Article unsourced, and searches found absolutely nothing. Christopher Connor (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Christopher I will add some links and review references to improve verification. I have added a link to footage from a 1984 Random Gender concert in Richard Branson's Golddigger's club where the demo is referred to, and will gather further sourced reviews as evidence to improve the article to the standard required for its inclusion on Wikipedia. Cousinss (talk • contribs) 00:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Christopher I have added quoted references to improve verefication and notability. Cousinss (talk • contribs) 01:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Christopher the following search links to videos for three of the tracks from the Foxhole Sessions http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&tbo=1&tbs=vid%3A1&q=%22The+Foxhole+Sessions%22+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Cousinss (talk • contribs) 02:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Christopher is the above sufficient evidence to request the removal of the proposed deletion from the Foxhole Sessions page? Cousinss (talk • contribs) 02:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong communicate 15:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - YouTube is not a reliable source. Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. SnottyWong communicate 15:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Random Gender, even though the unsourced information is already in the bands article; I think that page needs some additional references anyway. I looked, and couldn't find anything on "The Foxhole Sessions". I may be wrong, but this may be a nominal name for the sessions. Simon, is there another search term for this demo that could help out with finding reliable sources? - Theornamentalist (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Theornamentalist I have read WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG and understand that this page does not have enough notability. I have no other references for this demo apart from the one already added. There are no other names for it. It is not my intention to breach Wikipedia policy and I am learning fast through this experience. I am happy for this article to be deleted. - Cousinss (talk • contribs) 22:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Everyone, I have just read WP:COI Policy and understand that I need to declare a conflict of interest on this page and others that I have contributed to. I was a member of Random Gender and started this page. I wish to contribute information to improve pages and wish to do so with the strictest integrity and only in upholding the validity of Wikipedia. I am willing to learn and will make no further edits on pages where I have a conflict of interest. I will use the talk pages on articles to suggest neutral additions. I will read Wikipedia Policies before I contribute further. - Cousinss (talk • contribs) 23:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete self-promo. Wile E. Heresiarch (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.