Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fourth Dimension (philosophical book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to David Yonggi Cho. v/r - T P 01:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Fourth Dimension (philosophical book)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. The links are to a blog and booksellers. No indication in the article of its significance. A search turns up nothing like a reliable source. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Google search gives a lot of hits for "The Fourth Dimension" Yonggi Cho, but I have to agree with nominator, most of it are blogs or religious websites of questionable reliability. On the other hand, David Yonggi Cho is a notable person and his "belief in the fourth dimension" seems to be a notable concept. It is also clear that he authored the book. I would suggest redirecting the title to the main article about him (the article mentions the book). --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect I agree with the above; there's very little content on the page and it could easily be redirected to David Yonggi Cho who has an article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.