Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flying Cranes Recordings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Flying Cranes Recordings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a company that does not meet WP:GNG. Speedy deletion previously declined, although I do think it would qualify for a G11 speedy. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Icewhiz (talk) 11:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it is non-notable. I was unable to find any sourcing online. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete apart from the self promotion there is a lack of coverage in reliable sources at this time so WP:GNG is not passed Atlantic306 (talk) 16:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is just a vehicle for self-produced music from one artist, who has a history of promotion on Wikipedia. Blackguard 17:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This really should have disappeared under A7. A "prominent" (not) musician creates his own label on which he is the only artist, and then there's nothing to say about the label that's of any significance. A quick Google search shows that it's a slam dunk that this fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Largoplazo (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.