Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fall of Pagoda (book)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Fall of Pagoda (book)[edit]
- The Fall of Pagoda (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources, and no evidence of notability. Searches fail to show much independent coverage. PROD was removed by the author of the article without explanation. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —ManicSpider (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. —ManicSpider (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reluctant Delete I can't find anything English-language, but a search of Google Books or Google News Archives shows various articles in Chinese, but of course I can't make any comments about their content or reliability. - ManicSpider (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Eileen Chang is not a minor writer, and the book has some value as "the first of two semi-autobiographical novels". It book can be found online with its reference ISBN 9888028367. A page on the HKU Press can be found here [1]. olivier (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to keep. I have made some research and changes to the article. I have also moved it to a more appropriate title. The book is reviewed and mentioned in English in quite a few places on the internet. The material of the book formed the basis of another book from the same author which was a bestseller in Asia in 2009. The article needs quite a lot of rework, though. olivier (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.