Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dreamland Chronicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 15:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dreamland Chronicles[edit]

This webcomic does not appear to meet the notability criteria listed at WP:WEB. Specifically, the one award mentioned does not seem to be notable, and it is unclear whether the publisher qualifies the webcomic as being "distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators".Robin S (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 15:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As the WCCAs are a major factor in webcomicry, there was a predictably large amount of wrangling over its status and significance on Wikipedia during what ended up being called the Great Webcomics Purge in 2007. The end result of that mess was that the WCCAs do qualify here. --Kiz o r 20:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But no matter how this turns out, happy belated birthday! --Kiz o r 20:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I'll move anything worthwhile to the comixpedia wiki. I like this webcomic but unfortunately this article doesn't meet our core content policies. No sign of the reliable sources that would raise this above its current state as collection of unpublished analysis, original research, and plot summary. The award nominations are not for anything well-known. --Dragonfiend (talk) 09:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, strike that for now. My library computer system seems to be having issues so I can't be sure that my search for sources is working properly. --Dragonfiend (talk) 09:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as after several hours at the library I've found three pretty good sources (two reviews and a profile of the artist for an earlier project). This ought to just barely get this article to meet our content policies. --Dragonfiend (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.